
The decision of the Electoral College on Andia Ulliri's appeal can serve as a model to classify the misery of legal thought, to which Albanian justice has descended.
To summarize, we recall that the State Election Commissioner, upon announcing the results for the Durrës district, reasoned that the last mandate for Berisha's coalition belonged to former judge Arjan Ndoja.
Andia Ulliri appealed the decision of the State Election Commissioner and requested the KAS to review the gender quota for the distribution of mandates.
The KAS, with a long and clear decision, unanimously argued that according to the reading of the provisions of the Constitution and the Electoral Code, the gender quota was calculated separately for the closed and open lists.
Andia Ulliri, in her own right, filed an appeal against this decision with the Electoral College.
The absurdity of the College's decision proves the deplorable level to which the entire body of magistrates of the new justice system has perhaps descended.
The Electoral College ruled that Andia Ulliri was not eligible to appeal!
According to the Electoral College, Andia Ulliri had no right to appeal her mandate.
But nowhere does it say that the KAS is the final level of appeal review for the case.
The College of Absurdities ruled that Andia Ulliri had no legitimate interest in complaining about her mandate. After all, what did Andia need if she got the mandate or not?
And this is not humor. It is the decision of the Electoral College.
An Electoral College where the principles of law are not recognized to this level, shames the entire body of magistrates.
When you read the CVs later, and among them you see someone who the KPK has sent back to school to learn — because according to the KPK, he was legally incompetent — you understand the legal poverty in which the fates of Albanians float.
At this point, it seems like a luxury to claim that this level of professional misery can understand the Electoral Code and the Constitution.
No formal legal logic can legitimize them.
Just as law school cannot do that to them at the age of 55, when they couldn't even understand the basic lectures when they were 20.