Sali Berisha, who for years has been reading at conferences about every "spying" of the digital citizen and calls SPAK a criminal organization whenever investigations affect his people, has suddenly become a defender of investigative secrecy.
Regarding the Balluku file, the doctor says that "everything substantial has come out", but it is not being published because there are repentant witnesses and "confidentiality must be respected".
So, the same man who has published wiretaps, names, rumors, anonymous denunciations, and every piece of paper that has served him politically, now suddenly reveals the rule of law, the Constitution, and procedural ethics.
SPAK is a gang when it investigates its allies, but an institution to be respected when the file affects a political opponent.
In the end, the most interesting question remains: if "everything substantial has come out," then what is being guarded so solemnly? Investigative secrecy or a political monopoly on the flow of information?
