Ilirjan Celibashi today published a letter requesting the Regulatory Commission to convene to announce the final results of the May 11th Parliamentary Elections.
But yesterday, the Electoral College ruled against the illegal and overstepping of powers practice that Ilirjan Celibashi had followed in distributing mandates.
The Electoral College was obliged to express itself within the scope of the research that was conducted on it. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the Electoral College would express itself on the mandates of the entity “Albania Becomes Initiative”, and would overturn as unlawful those acts of the Commissioner.
But the Commissioner's illegality did not stop only at the allocation of mandates for this electoral entity.
This illegality also affects mandates of other subjects.
Celibashi must show with official acts whether these mandate allocations based on the criterion "who asks about the law" were issued as a reflection of his disregard for the law, or if there was some other motive that made him more willing to violate the law.
The Assembly cannot simultaneously accept a mandate based on enigmatic criteria "alla Celibashi" and on the criteria of the Electoral College that declared these criteria of the Commissioner who does not ask about the law as illegal and exceeding his competence.
Why doesn't Commissioner Celibashi reflect the changes in other acts issued by him regarding mandates that also affect other electoral subjects?
If it's not arrogance, what other interpretation does the Commissioner's stubbornness in not asking about the law have?
