Fatmir Xhafaj chose today to raise his voice against the head of the Energy Efficiency Agency, Ani Hasa, for a delayed response to the Parliament. An administrative delay, certainly criticizable, but quite minor in the face of the scandal that has struck the state at its heart: the Vlora Hyseni dossier and her communications with Ergys Agas, a person under investigation and wanted by justice.
At the parliamentary hearing, Xhafaj told Hasa that his institution was "not at all correct" in its relationship with Parliament, as it had taken 5 months to respond. He spoke about the authority of the Assembly, about the relationship with institutions and warned that the commission would draft a report to send to the agency's superiors.
But at the same time, when the country is facing one of the most serious national security scandals, the majority continues to behave as if the state's main problem is the delayed documents of an agency.
SPAK suspects that the former head of SHISH, Vlora Hyseni, had continuous communications with Ergys Agas, while the latter was under investigation and wanted. The documents in the file show that the communications between them were frequent, daily and prolonged in time, through phone calls, video calls, messages, photos and videos. According to the file, hundreds of forms of communication with the head of the secret service were found in Agas's device.
That's why Xhafaj's scene with Ani Hasa is more like the old proverb: no matter what the donkey does, the donkey falls. The majority is not seriously facing the question that weighs on it: who brought Vlora Hyseni to the head of SHISH, who kept her there and what did the institutions know about her contacts?
It's easier to play the strongman in the commission with an agency head. It's much harder to ask why an institution that was supposed to guard state secrets ended up at the center of a SPAK file.
And this is where political responsibility begins. Because the SHISH scandal is not simply a criminal record. It is a failure of state filters, political control, trusted appointments, and parliamentary oversight that the majority remembers only when faced with an easy "saddle" to hit.
