After the coded messages of the last two weeks on the Socialist Party forums, Elisa Spiropali decided today to react at length to the debate that has arisen around her positions.
In fact, it is no surprise that Elisa has so elaborated on her words that in some paragraphs it is almost impossible to clearly understand what she is saying. We are all left with the hope that at least Elisa herself understood what she wrote.
The message in the last sentence is perhaps the only one from which it can be understood that Elisa has decided to reflect. But not to speak openly about what is happening within the parliamentary group of the SP. To be silent and to refine her positions, and not to say bluntly what she thinks and worries. Because in the SP (and in the DP), unfortunately, free thought and speech have become a luxury that no one needs anymore.
Spiropali herself, in her Facebook reaction, uses formulations that sound profound, but that do not explain much about what is really happening. At one point she writes:
“My silence is not a lack of response, it is a boundary established between what needs to be said and what needs to be understood.”
In another paragraph he adds:
“What is happening is not simply a personal matter, but a manifestation of a pattern that is expanding with silent normality.”
Words that seem loaded with meaning, but that essentially do not indicate specifically what she is talking about, who she is talking about, and what is really happening within the Socialist Party. In the end, her response remains a long text of abstract reflections, which adds to Elisha's ambiguity rather than clarifying it.
