Democratic Party MP, Jorida Tabaku, has commented on the political action of Ervin Salianja, who has been holding meetings with Democrats in several cities across the country for days, considering it more as a clash of ideas with the DP leadership than as an open political conflict.
Invited to the "Afternoon Diary" show on A2 CNN, Tabaku expressed her disagreement with the way Salianji has chosen to conduct this action, insisting that debates and clashes should remain within the forums of the Democratic Party and not be moved to the public or to television studios.
"It doesn't seem like a clash to me, more like a clash of ideas. He has chosen his own path, which I don't agree with. I prefer that we have the discussions in the Presidency, in the Parliamentary Group. We have had enough in the television studios," said Tabaku.
However, as in many other cases, the Democratic MP avoided any direct comment on Sali Berisha's statements and the so-called "red lines" he has articulated towards Salijanj. No stance, no criticism and no distancing from the language and political pressure of the DP leader, remaining once again in an intermediate position, without names and without addresses.
Tabaku also spoke out against the voices within the DP that have called for Ervin Salianjan's expulsion from the party, emphasizing that this is not the moment for division, but for unity. Here too, as usual, without mentioning specific names or identifying those responsible for the calls for expulsion.
"I don't think that exceptions should be a word that dominates our vocabulary these moments. We need to reach out, to add, not to remove. We need to think about who to take with us, not who to remove," said Tabaku, adding that the DP forums should be the centers of debate and discussion.
In essence, Jorida Tabaku's stance remains the same: lukewarm criticism of form, silence on substance. Against Salijanj's action, but without daring to touch Berisha; in favor of debate, but only within the party walls; against exceptions, but without names and without responsibility. A "neither meat nor fish" stance, which more than political clarity, reflects the fear of openly saying what is really happening within the Democratic Party.
